4.7 Article

Non-Gaussian and Cooperative Dynamics of Entanglement Strands in Polymer Melts

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 54, 期 24, 页码 11384-11391

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01859

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short PEO tracers in a PEO melt exhibit significantly non-Gaussian dynamics within the entanglement volume, with a non-Gaussian correction quantified by a logarithmic Gaussian function that is independent of tracer length. The strength of the non-Gaussian correction is equal for all tracers, indicating that tracers mirror the host dynamics. At short times, the center-of-mass mean square displacements of tracers are subdiffusive until reaching the size of the reptation tube, then transitioning to Fickian diffusion, implying cooperative chain motion within the entanglement volume.
We present a study on tracer diffusion of short poly(ethylene oxide (PEO) tracers in a strongly entangled PEO melt. We find that within the entanglement volume, the dynamics of entanglement strands is significantly non-Gaussian. Following theoretical predictions of Guenza [Guenza, M. G. Phys. Rev. E 2014, 895 052603], we quantify the non-Gaussian correction alpha(2)(t) in terms of a logarithmic Gaussian function with a maximum at a time in the order of the Rouse times of different tracers and a width that is independent of the tracer's length. The strength of the non-Gaussian correction is found to be equal for all tracers providing another proof that tracers mirror the host dynamics, which needs to be independent of the tracer length. As for polyethylene [Zamponi, M. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 12618 187801], independent of their molecular weight, the tracer's center-of-mass mean square displacements are subdiffusive at short times until they have reached the size of the reptation tube d; then, a crossover to Fickian diffusion takes place indicating cooperative chain motion within the entanglement volume d(3). Thus, the host dynamics within the tube is not only cooperative but also significantly non-Gaussian.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据