4.7 Article

Selective Adsorption of Confined Polymers: Self-Consistent Field Theory Studies

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 54, 期 20, 页码 9602-9608

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01785

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21822302]
  2. NSFC-ISF Research Program - NSFC [21961142020]
  3. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [3396/19]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. High Performance Computing Center of Beihang University
  6. 1000-Talents Program of the Chinese Foreign Experts Bureau
  7. School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective adsorption of flexible polymers in a cylindrical pore, studied using self-consistent field theory (SCFT), shows different behaviors depending on the sequence of sticker monomers along the chain. The correlation between stickers and nonadsorbing monomers plays a crucial role in determining the adsorption efficiency of polymers.
Selective adsorption of flexible polymers, where only a fraction of the sticker monomers can be adsorbed, confined to a cylindrical pore, is studied within the self-consistent field theory (SCFT). The selective adsorption, modeled with di-block, alternating, and random distributions of the sticker monomers along the chain, shows different adsorption-desorption transition behaviors: when the polymer chain possesses a high fraction of stickers, the di-block sequence adsorbs better than the alternating and the random sequence. On the other hand, when the polymer chain possesses a low fraction of stickers, the alternating sequence is the most adsorbed chain. Our theory indicates that the correlation between stickers and nonadsorbing monomers (neutrals) enhances the adsorption of polymers at a low fraction of sticker monomers, while it hinders the adsorption of polymers at a high fraction of sticker monomers, revealing the mechanism of adsorption efficiency determined by the sequence of sticker monomers in a polymer chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据