4.7 Article

Development of Fluorescently Labeled, Functional Type I Collagen Molecules

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.202100144

关键词

collagen type I; fibrillogenesis kinetics; fibril structure and morphology; functional fluorescent labeling; single molecule orientation microscopy

资金

  1. NIH/NEI [R21EY029167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the growth and remodeling of extant collagen fibrils, and demonstrates that labeling collagen molecules with small fluorophores can effectively address the observation-interference problem while preserving the characteristics of the fibrils.
While de novo collagen fibril formation is well-studied, there are few investigations into the growth and remodeling of extant fibrils, where molecular collagen incorporation into and erosion from the fibril surface must delicately balance during fibril growth and remodeling. Observing molecule/fibril interactions is difficult, requiring the tracking of molecular dynamics while, at the same time, minimizing the effect of the observation on fibril structure and assembly. To address the observation-interference problem, exogenous collagen molecules are tagged with small fluorophores and the fibrillogenesis kinetics of labeled collagen molecules as well as the structure and network morphology of assembled fibrils are examined. While excessive labeling significantly disturbs fibrillogenesis kinetics and network morphology of assembled fibrils, adding less than approximate to 1.2 labels per collagen molecule preserves these characteristics. Applications of the functional, labeled collagen probe are demonstrated in both cellular and acellular systems. The functional, labeled collagen associates strongly with native fibrils and when added to an in vitro model of corneal stromal development at low concentration, the labeled collagen is incorporated into a fine extracellular matrix (ECM) network associated with the cells within 24 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据