4.5 Article

Early, intermediate and late fusion strategies for robust deep learning-based multimodal action recognition

期刊

MACHINE VISION AND APPLICATIONS
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-021-01249-8

关键词

Action recognition; Early fusion; Intermediate fusion; Late fusion; Deep learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multimodal action recognition techniques combine multiple image modalities, including early fusion, intermediate fusion, and late fusion methods for more robust recognition. By deeply investigating different fusion levels, new schemes are proposed to better combine features from different modalities and achieve better recognition results than traditional methods.
Multimodal action recognition techniques combine several image modalities (RGB, Depth, Skeleton, and InfraRed) for a more robust recognition. According to the fusion level in the action recognition pipeline, we can distinguish three families of approaches: early fusion, where the raw modalities are combined ahead of feature extraction; intermediate fusion, the features, respective to each modality, are concatenated before classification; and late fusion, where the modality-wise classification results are combined. After reviewing the literature, we identified the principal defects of each category, which we try to address by first investigating more deeply the early-stage fusion that has been poorly explored in the literature. Second, intermediate fusion protocols operate on the feature map, irrespective of the particularity of human action, we propose a new scheme where we optimally combine modality-wise features. Third, as most of the late fusion solutions use handcrafted rules, prone to human bias, and far from real-world peculiarities, we adopt a neural learning strategy to extract significant features from data rather than assuming that artificial rules are correct. We validated our findings on two challenging datasets. Our obtained results were as good or better than their literature counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据