4.7 Article

Changes in the volatile profile, fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of flaxseed oil during heating at different temperatures

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112137

关键词

Flaxseed oil; Volatile organic compound; Heating temperature; Characteristic aroma

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31760434, 31360389]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the fatty acid content of FSO significantly decreased during heating, while physicochemical indices increased. Calculation of odor activity values can help assess the degree of oxidation in FSO.
The deterioration of flaxseed oil (FSO) during heating greatly influences the quality of fried foods. FSOs heated at different temperatures (120 degrees C, 150 degrees C, 180 degrees C, and 210 degrees C) were investigated for volatile organic compound (VOC) and fatty acid compositions and physicochemical indices. In total, 84 VOCs were identified, including 20 aldehydes (37.43%-66.17%), 20 alcohols (31.19%-42.90%), 9 esters (0.28%-1.27%), 8 ketones (0.4%-1.58%), 19 alkanes (1.15%-19.96%), and 8 heterocyclics (0.68%-6.16%). Furthermore, 1-nonanal, 2,4-decadienal, hexanal, and trans,trans-2,4-heptadienal were identified as the characteristic aroma compounds to estimate the oxidation degree of heated FSO through the calculation of odor activity values. The polyunsaturated fatty acid content in FSO significantly (p < 0.05) decreased by 5.75 mu g/g after heating at 210 degrees C. The physicochemical indices of FSO increased during heating with acid, peroxide, p-anisidine and thiobarbituric acid values ranging from 0.26 to 0.55 mg NaOH/g, 0.041-0.066 g/100 g, 0.12-0.88, and 0.025-0.088, respectively. Results of Pearson correlation analysis indicate that 2,4-decadienal and hexanal may be oxidation deterioration markers in FSO. This study provides a theoretical basis for evaluation of the suitability of FSO for household food preparation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据