4.7 Article

The relation between phytochemical composition and sensory traits of selected Brassica vegetables

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.113028

关键词

Brassica; Bitterness; Glucosinolates; Isothiocyanates; Phenolics

资金

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [548 2015/18/M/NZ9/00372]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the main groups of sensory active compounds in different cultivars of Brassica vegetables, finding significant differences in concentration and a correlation between bitterness and glucosinolates. Sugar concentration was positively correlated with general desirability in certain vegetables, while a lack of correlation was observed between phenolic content and taste.
Main groups of sensory active compounds - glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, phenolics and sugars in 3 cultivars of broccoli, 5 of Brussels sprout, 3 of cauliflower, and 4 of kohlrabi, both raw and cooked, were analyzed and correlated with selected sensory traits. The differences in the concentration of these components were significant between different vegetables and also noticeable between cultivars of one vegetable. The bitterness of Brussels sprouts and broccoli was correlated with glucosinolates, though Brussel sprouts contained definitely higher concentration ( 1 g/kg fw) of these substances than their concentration in broccoli (<0.3 g/kg fw), or other vegetables. A positive correlation between sugar concentration and general desirability was observed in Brussels sprouts (0.91 - raw), kohlrabi (0.53 - raw; 0.80 - cooked), and raw cauliflower (0.85). According to sensory analysis, the high correlation between sweetness level and general desirability was observed, however, sweetness intensity was not correlated with total sugars concentration. A lack of any correlation between phenolic content and taste was observed. The results presented in this work emphasized the diversity of investigated Brassica vegetables from both phytochemical and sensory point of view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据