4.7 Article

Improving the lipid oxidation of beef patties by plasma-modified essential oil/protein edible composite films

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112662

关键词

Plasma; Essential oil; Composite films; Lipid oxidation; Beef patty

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China [2018YFD0700802]
  2. Jiangsu Agri-cultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund [CX (18) 3041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By combining plasma treatment with essential oil/protein edible composite films, this study aimed to regulate lipid oxidation in meat. Results demonstrated that this method effectively improved meat preservation by reducing oxidation reactions and decreasing the presence of volatile compounds.
To regulate the lipid oxidation of meat induced by plasma treatment, this study combined plasma with essential oil/protein edible composite films. Effects of plasma on the physicochemical properties of the composite film, such as color, swelling rate, solubility, transmittance, water vapor permeability, and chemical bonds, were evaluated. Changes in basic physicochemical properties and volatile compounds of fresh beef patties coated with composite films after plasma treatment were evaluated. Results showed that plasma treatment had no significant effect on the physicochemical properties of films (p 0.05). Plasma treatment could accelerate the penetration of essential oil into meat and improve the sterilization efficiency, the total bacterial count in meat decreased from 4.66 to 3.75 log CFU/g (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, composite films could significantly reduce the plasma-induced lipid oxidation from 0.16 to 0.06 mg MDA/kg (p < 0.05), and decrease the existence of 10 volatile compounds (including alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, and esters) in beef patties after plasma treatment. In general, the application of plasma combined with composite films in the preservation of fresh meat has a good application prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据