4.7 Article

Quinoa bioactive protein hydrolysate produced by pancreatin enzyme-functional and antioxidant properties

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111853

关键词

Bioactive peptides; Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.); Pancreatin enzyme; Antioxidant protein hydrolysate; FTIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that quinoa protein hydrolysate (QPH) prepared by pancreatin hydrolysis has better emulsifying, foaming, and antioxidant properties compared to quinoa protein concentrate (QPC). However, QPC showed better emulsion/foam stabilizing properties.
Quinoa protein with great functional properties has been considered a potential source for food fortification or the production of functional foods. In this study, quinoa protein hydrolysate (QPH) was prepared from quinoa protein concentrate (QPC) after hydrolysis by pancreatin (pancreatic) enzyme. The emulsifying, foaming, and antioxidant activities, the emulsion and foam stabilization, as well as amino acid profile and chemical composition were evaluated. The highest degree of hydrolysis (19.17%) was obtained after 180 min. The amino acid profile (by high-performance liquid chromatography: HPLC) showed that glutamic acid and lysine had the highest contents and all essential (limiting) amino acids were recorded. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy showed hydroxylic and aromatic amino acid residues in the QPC and it was inferred that different functional groups have originated in QPH that confirms the hydrolyzing action of pancreatin enzyme. QPH had the lowest solubility at the isoelectric pH of 5 (pI similar to 5) and had better emulsifying, foaming, and antioxidant properties compared to QPC. In contrast, QPC had better emulsion/foam stabilizing properties. Overall, this study suggests that pancreatin could be employed for hydrolysis of quinoa protein and its hydrolysate with functional properties could be possibly considered for food fortification or production of functional foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据