4.7 Article

Impact of Soy-Cow's mixed milk enzyme modified cheese on bread aroma

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112793

关键词

Wheat dough; Low-molecular-weight peptides; Amino acids; Volatiles

资金

  1. Postdoctoral Science Fund, China [2020M671344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the impact of spray-dried Soy-Cow's mixed milk enzyme modified (SC-EM) cheese on wheat dough properties and bread aroma at different levels. It was found that higher levels of SC-EM cheese led to significant accumulation of amino acids and peptides in the dough, contributing to the bread aroma. The study identified a total of 118 volatile compounds in the bread, with newly identified compounds such as isoamyl alcohol, lactic acid ethyl ester, ethyl sorbate and sorbic acid. The results suggest that SC-EM cheese could be used as an improver in dough and enhance bread aroma, supporting its inclusion in fortified bakery products.
The effect of spray-dried Soy-Cow's mixed milk enzyme modified (SC-EM) cheese on wheat dough properties and bread aroma was evaluated at either 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0% (w/w). Significant accumulation of amino acids and peptides of dough were noted as SC-EM cheese levels increased. After baking a total of 118 volatile compounds (VCs) were identified in breads having aldehydes, alcohols, esters and acids in major proportions. Higher contents of Maillard product 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, 2-methyl-1-propanol, phenylethyl alcohol, undecane, L-limonene, 2-pentyl furan and lipid oxidation compounds hexanoic acid ethyl ester, octanoic acid ethyl ester, decanoic acid ethyl ester, butanoic acid, hexanoic acid and octanoic acid were observed. Isoamyl alcohol, lactic acid ethyl ester, ethyl sorbate and sorbic acid were the newly identified VCs. These results revealed that SCEM cheese could be used as improver in dough and contribution to bread aroma. Thus, SC-EM cheese has been proposed to be included in fortified bakery products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据