4.7 Article

Assessment of spoilage potential and amino acids deamination & decarboxylation activities of Shewanella putrefaciens in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.113016

关键词

Bigeye tuna; Shewanella putrefaciens; Biogenic amine; Free amino acid; Deamination decarboxylation activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972142]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19DZ1207503]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Project to enhance the capabilities of the platform [19DZ1207503, 19DZ2284000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the spoilage potential and metabolic activities of two strains of Shewanella putrefaciens in bigeye tuna blocks. The results showed that one strain, 00A, had a stronger spoilage potential compared to the other strain, 00B, possibly due to its lower histamine decarboxylation activity.
Two Shewanella putrefaciens strains (00A and 00B) were inoculated into sterile bigeye tuna blocks. The biochemical changes (trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-soluble peptides, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), ammonia, trimethylamine (TMA), biogenic amines (BAs), free amino acids (FAA), and total amino acids (TAA)), decarboxylation and deamination activities of S. putrefaciens in bigeye tuna blocks were investigated in this study. All indicators, except for histamine, showed that 00A had a stronger spoilage potential than 00B. The extremely low histamine decarboxylation activities of 00A and 00B may be the main reason for the nonsignificant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups in tuna. Meanwhile, arginine deiminase pathway can produce large amounts of putrescine and energy, and arginine deiminase may be the main rate-limiting enzyme of the whole pathway. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the difference between TCA-soluble peptide and FAA content in the inoculated groups may be the main reason for the difference in the spoilage potential of the two strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据