4.5 Article

Utilization of N,S-doped carbon dots as a fluorescent nanosensor for determination of cromolyn based on inner filter effect: application to aqueous humour

期刊

LUMINESCENCE
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 713-721

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bio.4212

关键词

aqueous humour; cromolyn sodium; inner filter effect; nitrogen; sulfur-carbon quantum dots

资金

  1. Mansoura University [Mu-phra-21-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and eco-friendly hydrothermal technique was used to prepare water soluble N- and S-co-doped carbon quantum dots probes. The synthesized N,S-CQDs showed high luminescence and were used as an optical nanosensor for detecting cromolyn sodium in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The method was optimized and validated according to the International Council of Harmonisation guidelines and proved to be environmentally friendly.
A simple and eco-friendly hydrothermal technique is used to prepare water soluble N- and S-co-doped carbon quantum dots probes (N,S-CQDs) from thiosemicarbazide and citric acid. Several characterization techniques were performed to ensure the successful synthesis of highly luminescent N,S-CQDs. The prepared probe exhibited analytical potential as an optical nanosensor for the spectrofluorimetric determination of cromolyn sodium (CRO) in its pharmaceutical dosage forms and aqueous humour. The emission intensity of the synthesized N,S-CQDs was measured at 411 nm after excitation at 345 nm. Addition of increasing concentrations of CRO to N,S-CQDs led to quenching of its fluorescence intensity. CRO was investigated within a wide concentration range 10.0-150.0 mu M with a limit of detection of 2.0 mu M and a limit of quantification of 6.0 mu M. The quenching of fluorescent N,S-CQDs occurred through the inner filter effect (IFE). The developed spectrofluorimetric method was successfully optimized and validated according to the International Council of Harmonisation guidelines (ICH). The method greenness is proved through using both Eco-Scale and AGREE approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据