4.8 Article

100-Layer Error-Free 5D Optical Data Storage by Ultrafast Laser Nanostructuring in Glass

期刊

LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202100563

关键词

nanostructuring; optical data storage; silica glass; ultrafast lasers

资金

  1. European Research Council (ENIGMA) [789116]
  2. Microsoft
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [789116] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high capacity and ultra-long lifetime 5D optical data storage using femtosecond-laser-induced nanopore structures in silica glass has been realized. This technology allows recording and retrieving thousands of layers of multibit digital data with >99% transmission and minimal readout error.
The demand for energy efficient data storage technologies with high capacity and long life span is increasingly growing due to the explosion of digital information in modern society. Here, a 5D optical data storage with high capacity and ultralong lifetime is realized by femtosecond-laser-induced anisotropic nanopore structures (type X modification) in silica glass. The ultrahigh transmission of this birefringent modification, >99% in the visible range, allows recording and retrieving thousands of layers of multibit digital data practically. Type X formation is associated with moderate free carrier density produced close to the energy threshold of avalanche ionization. Higher retardance with increased repetition rate at low pulse energy is attributed to accumulation of defects (nonbridging oxygen hole centers), enabling rapid imprinting of voxels by megahertz-rate pulses. Data recording of 7 bits per voxel, i.e., 2(5) azimuth angles and 2(2) retardance levels is experimentally demonstrated with readout error as small as 0.6%. Furthermore, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams is optically recorded with a data writing speed of 8 kB s(-1) in 100 layers of voxels and the proven data readout accuracy of 100%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据