4.6 Article

Confining Natural/Mimetic Enzyme Cascade in an Amorphous Metal-Organic Framework for the Construction of Recyclable Biomaterials with Catalytic Activity

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 927-936

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02093

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2021YFC2100100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22007049]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200718, BK20200728]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [20KJB350010]
  5. Jiangsu Innovation and Entrepreneurship Doctoral Program
  6. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we successfully encapsulated glucose oxidase and magnetic nanoparticles using amorphous ZIF-90 as a host material, creating a promising enzymatic cascade catalyst.
Integrating nanozymes with natural enzymes to form cascade reactions is one of the most promising ways to develop biocatalysts with versatile performance; however, the applicability of the cascade is typically hampered by the instability of enzymes and the hindrance of mass transfer in the host environment. Utilizing amorphous ZIF-90 (aZIF-90) as a host material, herein, we have reported a one-pot way to encapsulate glucose oxidase (GOx) and magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) to form GOx/MNP@aZIF-90. We reasoned that the amorphous structure of ZIF-90 not only provides a protected environment to confine the cascade reaction but also generates mesopores and internal voids to improve the performance of the enzymatic cascade. The catalytic activity of aZIF-90 was almost 4 times higher than that of crystalline composites, and the residual activity was higher than 80% after being stored for 9 days. This is the first time that GOx and MNP were simultaneously confined in aZIF-90 with mesopores, which suggested that an amorphous metal-organic framework is promising in the development of an enzymatic cascade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据