4.6 Article

A New Concept for an Adhesive Material Inspired by Clingfish Sucker Nanofilaments

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 1215-1222

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02972

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS [20K05634]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K05634] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article analyzes the effect of the combination of nanofilaments and mucus on the adhesion force of clingfish sucker disk. The study found that nanofilaments can enhance the adhesion force of mucus, and the hardness and length of the nanofilaments and the Young's modulus and thickness of the mucus-mimicking layer also have significant effects on the adhesion force. The structural combination of hardness and softness in the clingfish sucker disk is crucial for achieving strong adhesion.
Underwater adhesive materials are in high demand in various fields, and fish species with sucker disks have attracted attention due to their superior performance and interesting structures. The clingfish, in particular, is widely known for using hierarchical sucker disk structures to demonstrate rapid and strong adhesion to rocky surfaces under strong currents. We examined the combination of nanofilaments and mucus in the clingfish sucker disk. Nanofilaments reinforce mucus adhesion force by reducing the compliance without affecting the contact area. We prepared structures from hard polymers and soft polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) that mimicked clingfish sucker nanofilaments and mucus, with these biomimetic structures showing significant adhesion force underwater. Furthermore, the hardness and length of the nanofilaments and Young's modulus and thickness of the mucus-mimicking PDMS layer had critical effects on the adhesion force. According to the results, clingfish nanofilaments act as hard bracing for the soft mucus, and the structural combination of the conflicting characteristics of hardness and softness, thus achieved, is crucial for strong adhesion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据