4.6 Article

Temporal Evolution of Surface Contamination under Ultra-high Vacuum

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 1252-1258

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c03062

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rice University
  2. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AR0000ABC]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1419807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the time-dependent surface composition of gold samples with different initial levels of contamination under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions. The results show that the concentration of surface hydrocarbons under UHV can be explained by molecular adsorption-desorption competition theory. The study provides insights into the temporal evolution of surface contamination under UHV and suggests methods to mitigate its effects.
Ultra-high vacuum (UHV) is essential to many surface characterization techniques and is often applied with the intention of reducing exposure to airborne contaminants. Surface contamination under UHV is not well-understood, however, and introduces uncertainty in surface elemental characterization or hinders surface-sensitive manufacturing approaches. In this work, we investigated the time-dependent surface composition of gold samples with different initial levels of contamination under UHV over a period of 24 h with both experiments and physical modeling. Our results show that surface hydrocarbon concentration under UHV can be explained by molecular adsorption-desorption competition theory. Gold surfaces that were initially pristine adsorbed hydrocarbons over time under UHV; conversely, surfaces that were initially heavily contaminated desorbed hydrocarbons over time. During both adsorption and desorption, the concentration of contaminants tended toward the same equilibrium value. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the temporal evolution of surface contamination under UHV and highlights routes to mitigate surface contamination effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据