4.4 Article

PAM/PEI polymer gel for water control in high-temperature and high-pressure conditions: Core flooding with crossflow effect

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 605-615

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-021-1006-y

关键词

Polymer Gel; Organic Crosslinker; Water Control; Core Flooding; Cross Flow

资金

  1. University of Malaya [IF062-2019, FP050-2019A]
  2. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS [YUTP 0153AAH05]
  3. Ministry of Education Malaysia
  4. Polygon Scientific Sdn. Bhd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the performance of different mixtures of polymer gels through core flooding tests, and the results show that the addition of solid particles can enhance the gel strength and improve oil recovery in oil fields.
Polymer gel has been established as a water shut-off control agent for improved oil recovery. The role of the polymer gel in conformance control is to divert injected water from high permeability to low permeability zones of the reservoir. This paper presents a series of core flooding tests performed to investigate the propagation, blocking capability, permeability reduction and diverting performance of various mixtures of polymer gels at simulated reservoir condition. In this particular study, a core flooding scheme with crossflow effect using composite core has permeability contrast. Core flooding test with crossflow effect simulates reservoirs with communication between reservoir permeability layers. Experimental results show that PAM/PEI polymer gel reinforced with solid silica NP has been proven to provide satisfactory gel strength to divert water flow, thus recovering an additional 24% of oil. This reinforced PAM/PEI polymer gel tends to recover more trapped oil compared to weakened PAM/PEI polymer gel without solid particles. These results give better understanding and provide additional knowledge of strengthening gel by addition of solid particles, which could be the remedy for the weakened polymer gel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据