4.7 Article

Task-oriented attributed network embedding by multi-view features

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107448

关键词

Network embedding; Network representation learning; Multi-view features; Node classification; Link prediction

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB2102200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61202262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Network embedding, or network representation learning, aims to define low-dimensional vector representations of nodes while preserving network structure. Recent efforts have led to the development of a unified framework TANE, which can adapt to different network tasks and achieve superior performance.
Network embedding, also known as network representation learning, aims at defining low-dimensional, continuous vector representation of nodes to maximally preserve the network structure. Recent efforts attempt to extend network embedding to attributed networks where nodes are enriched with descriptors, to enhance interpretability. However, most of these efforts seldom consider the additional knowledge relevant to the aim of the downstream network analysis, i.e. task-related information. When they do, they are analysis-specific and thus lack adaptability to alternative tasks. In this article, a unified framework TANE is proposed to learn Task-oriented Attributed Network Embedding that jointly, maximally and consistently preserves multiple types of network information to generate rich nodes representations, robust to a variety of analyses. The framework can flexibly adapt to, and be readily modified for, different network-based tasks in an end-to-end way. The results of extensive experiments on well-known and commonly used datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework TANE can achieve superior performance over state-of-the-art methods in two commonly performed tasks: node classification and link prediction. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据