4.7 Article

Protein-ligand docking using differential evolution with an adaptive mechanism

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107433

关键词

Protein-ligand docking; Differential evolution; Parameter adaptation; Optimization; Molecular docking

资金

  1. Research Foundation for Talented Scholars of Changzhou University, China [ZMF20020459]
  2. JSPS, Japan KAKENHI [19K12136]
  3. Changzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, China [CE20205048]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K12136] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes an adaptive differential evolution algorithm and the scoring function of AutoDock Vina to address the protein-ligand docking problem, with experimental results indicating its effectiveness compared to other evolutionary algorithms.
The protein-ligand docking problem plays a crucial role in the drug discovery process and remains challenging in bioinformatics. A successful protein-ligand docking approach depends on two key factors: an efficient search strategy and an effective scoring function. In this study, we attempt to use an adaptive differential evolution (DE) algorithm as the search strategy. The search ability of the proposed DE algorithm is improved by incorporating a parameter adaptation scheme and a modified mutation strategy. In addition, the scoring function of the classical AutoDock Vina suite is employed as the fitness function of the proposed approach. Finally, the performance of the adaptive DE method in solving the protein-ligand docking problem is evaluated on 40 test docking instances. The experimental results and statistical analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive DE algorithm compared with five other classical evolutionary algorithms. The results of this study reveal that employing powerful evolutionary algorithms, such as adaptive DE, contributes to solving the protein-ligand docking problem. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据