4.7 Review

Learning with Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion: A review and new perspectives

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107567

关键词

Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion(HSIC); Feature selection; Dimensionality reduction; Clustering; Kernel method; Machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article provides an in-depth survey of learning methods using the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) for various learning problems, such as feature selection, dimensionality reduction, clustering, and kernel learning and optimization. It systematically reviews typical learning models based on the HSIC, ranging from supervised learning to unsupervised learning, traditional machine learning to transfer learning and deep learning. The relationships between learning methods using the HSIC and other relevant learning algorithms are also discussed, aiming to provide practitioners valuable guidelines for their specific domains by elucidating the similarities and differences of these learning models.
The Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) was originally designed to measure the statistical dependence of the distribution-based Hilbert space embedding in statistical inference. In recent years, it has been witnessed that this criterion can tackle a large number of learning problems owing to its effectiveness and high efficiency. In this article, we provide an in-depth survey of learning methods using the HSIC for various learning problems, like feature selection, dimensionality reduction, clustering, and kernel learning and optimization. Specifically, after introducing the basic idea of HISC, we systematically review the typical learning models based on the HISC, ranging from supervised learning to unsupervised learning, as well as from traditional machine learning to transfer learning and deep learning, followed by remaining challenges and future directions. The relationships between learning methods using the HSIC and other relevant learning algorithms are also discussed. We expect to provide practitioners valuable guidelines for their specific domains by elucidating the similarities and differences of these learning models. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据