4.5 Article

An individualized decision between physical therapy or surgery for patients with degenerative meniscal tears cannot be based on continuous treatment selection markers: a marker-by-treatment analysis of the ESCAPE study

期刊

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 1937-1948

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06851-x

关键词

Knee; Meniscus; Rehabilitation; Orthopedics; Exercise; Prediction; Individualized; Healthcare

资金

  1. Dutch Arthritis Society (in Dutch: ReumaNederland) [18-2-201]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (in Dutch: ZonMw) [837002009]
  3. foundation of medical research of OLVG, Amsterdam [15u.025]
  4. Zilverenkruis Health Insurance [Z436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Marker-by-treatment analyses are a promising new method in internal medicine, but have not yet been applied to orthopaedics. This study introduced a novel approach in orthopaedic research to identify treatment selection markers that affect outcomes following meniscal surgery or physical therapy in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Several potential treatment selection markers were identified, but no consistent markers were found across all follow-up times.
Purpose Marker-by-treatment analyses are promising new methods in internal medicine, but have not yet been implemented in orthopaedics. With this analysis, specific cut-off points may be obtained, that can potentially identify whether meniscal surgery or physical therapy is the superior intervention for an individual patient. This study aimed to introduce a novel approach in orthopaedic research to identify relevant treatment selection markers that affect treatment outcome following meniscal surgery or physical therapy in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Methods Data were analysed from the ESCAPE trial, which assessed the treatment of patients over 45 years old with a degenerative meniscal tear. The treatment outcome of interest was a clinically relevant improvement on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form at 3, 12, and 24 months follow-up. Logistic regression models were developed to predict the outcome using baseline characteristics (markers), the treatment (meniscal surgery or physical therapy), and a marker-by-treatment interaction term. Interactions with p < 0.10 were considered as potential treatment selection markers and used these to develop predictiveness curves which provide thresholds to identify marker-based differences in clinical outcomes between the two treatments. Results Potential treatment selection markers included general physical health, pain during activities, knee function, BMI, and age. While some marker-based thresholds could be identified at 3, 12, and 24 months follow-up, none of the baseline characteristics were consistent markers at all three follow-up times. Conclusion This novel in-depth analysis did not result in clear clinical subgroups of patients who are substantially more likely to benefit from either surgery or physical therapy. However, this study may serve as an exemplar for other orthopaedic trials to investigate the heterogeneity in treatment effect. It will help clinicians to quantify the additional benefit of one treatment over another at an individual level, based on the patient's baseline characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据