4.2 Article

Significance of wing interference patterns as taxonomic characters in Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12542

关键词

color; fore wing; interference color; interference pattern; parasitoid; variation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the usefulness of wing interference patterns and colors in taxonomy, showing that both qualitative and quantitative measurements can discriminate different taxa at the genus and species level. Despite some slight qualitative differences between sexes, quantitative measurements were not sexually dimorphic.
Wing interference patterns (WIPs) and wing interference colors have been highlighted in taxonomy for their usefulness in the discrimination of species, particularly in the case of some parasitic wasps. Here, we evaluate the usefulness of these stable structural color patterns as species-specific characters in nine species of Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) within seven genera including Aphidus Nees, 1819; Binodoxys Mackauer, 1960; Diaeretiella StarATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE, 1960; Ephedrus Haliday, 1833; Lysiphlebus Forster, 1863; Praon Haliday, 1833; and Trioxys Haliday, 1833. Six color parameters including red, green, and blue (RGB) as well as hue, saturation, and value were compared. Preliminary statistical analysis of color values, as well as a qualitative comparison of patterns, were performed. Our findings show that both qualitative and quantitative measurements can discriminate selected taxa at the genus and species level. Moreover, different biotypes of Lysiphlebus fabraum (Marshall) and Aphidus matricariae Haliday present identical color patterns (WIPs) with only slight qualitative differences. Despite some slight qualitative differences in WIPs between sexes, quantitative measurements were not sexually dimorphic. This is the first study of its kind in the subfamily Aphidiinae and to provide a preliminary WIP-based key to the studied species of Aphidiinae. Our findings show that WIPs and WICs are stable and can be useful for museum collections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据