4.6 Article

Seismic control of damaged structure by pole assignment and intermittent wavelet-based identification

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL
卷 29, 期 3-4, 页码 528-542

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10775463211049590

关键词

System identification; wavelet; pole assignment; earthquake; structural control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research introduces the intermittent wavelet-based identification technique and pole assignment control to overcome the effect of dynamic characteristics changes on control force calculation. Experimental results show that the proposed adapted pole assignment method performs better in reducing damaged structure response compared to other control methods.
Calculation of the control forces by control algorithms, such as the pole assignment, proportional-integral-derivative, and linear quadratic regulator, is usually based on initial dynamic characteristics of the intact and undamaged structure, which is considered to be in the ideal conditions. However, because of the effect of natural loads and damage due to aging, these features can change during the structure's life span, eventually leading to incorrect control forces. In this research, to overcome this problem and to get closer to the actual dynamic characteristics and on the other hand, in order to elude the adverse effects of real-time identification, such as elapsed time of detection, induced to the controller, the intermitted wavelet-based identification technique besides the pole assignment control is introduced. Performance of the proposed controller on three- and five-story with different cases of stiffness and two failure scenarios, under far and near-field earthquakes, are examined and compared by non-updated wavelet-based pole assignment, proportional-integral-derivative and linear quadratic regulator controllers. Results show that damaged structure response controlled by the suggested adapted pole assignment method is significantly reduced compared to ones controlled by other control methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据