4.7 Article

FOXA1 can be modulated by HDAC3 in the progression of epithelial ovarian carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03224-3

关键词

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma; HDAC3; FOXA1; Progression; Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the function of FOXA1 in ovarian cancer and the relationship between FOXA1 and HDAC3. It was found that FOXA1 can be modulated by HDAC3 through the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and plays essential roles in proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of EOC cell lines and xenograft experiments.
FOXA1 is associated with malignant tumors, but the function of FOXA1 in EOC is unclear. HDAC3 can influence the proliferation, migration and invasion ability of EOC. In this study, we wanted to explore the function of FOXA1 in ovarian cancer and the relationship between HDAC3 and FOXA1.The expression of HDAC3 and FOXA1 was detected by immunohistochemical staining of primary lesions from 127 epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients. A proliferation assay, a Transwell assay, an apoptosis assay and animal experiments were used to assess the proliferation, invasion and apoptosis abilities of ovarian cancer cells before and after transfection with FOXA1. The relevance of the in vitro findings was confirmed in xenografts. The H-scores for FOXA1 and HDAC3 staining in FIGO stage III-IV were noticeably higher and predicted adverse clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. The expression level of HDAC3 was significantly correlated with the expression level of FOXA1. Invasion, proliferation and apoptosis capacity and tumor formation were decreased in the FOXA1-knockdown cells. Experiments in xenografts confirmed that HDAC3 mediated tumor formation. In conclusion, FOXA1 can be modulated by HDAC3 through the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway, and FOXA1 plays essential roles in the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of EOC cell lines and xenograft experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据