4.5 Article

3D printing of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)/niobium containing bioactive glasses (BAGNb) scaffolds: Characterization of composites, in vitro bioactivity, and in vivo bone repair

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/term.3276

关键词

bone regeneration; niobium; porosity; three-dimensional printings; tissue scaffolds

资金

  1. CAPES Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study produced PBAT/BAGNb composite scaffolds using FDM printing and evaluated their physicochemical and biological properties in vitro and in vivo. The scaffolds showed high porosity and cell mineralization ability. In vivo results indicated that PBAT/BAGNb group exhibited good new bone formation.
This study aimed to produce poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)/niobium containing bioactive glasses (BAGNb) composites scaffolds produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing and evaluate their physicochemical and biological properties in vitro and in vivo. The composite filaments were produced by melt-extrusion with the addition of 10 wt% of BAGNb (PBAT/BAGNb). Filaments without BAGNb were produced as the control group (PBAT). The filaments were characterized and were used to produce 3D-printed scaffolds using FDM. The scaffolds' structure and surface properties were assessed. In vitro cell, proliferation, and cell mineralization analysis were performed. In vivo data was obtained in the rat femur model (n = 10), and the bone repair was assessed after 15, 30, and 60 postoperative days. The printed structures presented 69.81% porosity for the PBAT/BAGNb group and 74.54% for the PBAT group. Higher cell mineralization was observed for the PBAT/BAGNb group. The in vivo data showed that the PBAT/BAGNb presented new bone formation comparable to positive controls. The combination of PBAT and BAGNb in 3D-printed scaffolds may be an alternative to produce bioactive materials with controllable shapes and properties for bone regeneration treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据