4.6 Article

Outcomes of reoperative aortic root surgery

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.060

关键词

Key Words; acute aortic dissection; aorta; aortic aneurysm; aortic root replacement; infective endocarditis; redo surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of reoperative aortic root replacement on short-term outcomes and survival. The study found that reoperative aortic root replacement provided similar outcomes and survival compared to first-time aortic root replacement.
Objective: The study objective was to determine the impact of reoperative aortic root replacement on short-term outcomes and survival. Methods: This was a retrospective study of aortic root operations from 2010 to 2018. All patients with a complete aortic root replacement were included, and pa-tients undergoing valve-sparing root replacements were excluded. Patients were dichotomized by first-time sternotomy versus redo sternotomy, which was defined as having had a prior sternotomy for whatever reason. Within the redo sternotomy group, reoperative aortic root replacements were identified, being defined as a complete aortic root replacement in patients with a prior aortic root replacement; 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity matching was used to compare outcomes across groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated and compared using log-rank statistics. Results: A total of 893 patients undergoing complete ARR were identified, of whom 595 (67%) underwent first-time sternotomy and 298 (33%) underwent redo ster-notomy. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar for the first-time and redo sternotomy groups, including operative mortality. Redo sternotomy was not associated with reduced survival after aortic root replacement compared with first-time sternotomy (P = .084), with 5-year survival of 73.7% for first-time ster-notomy and 72.9% for redo sternotomy. In the redo sternotomy group (n = 298), 69 (23%) were reoperative aortic root replacements and 229 (77%) were first-time aortic root replacements. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar for the first-time and reoperative aortic root replacement groups, including operative mortality. Reoperative aortic root replacement was not associ-ated with reduced survival, compared with first-time aortic root replacement (P = .870), with 5-year survival of 67.9% for first-time aortic root replacement and 72.1% for reoperative aortic root replacement. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic root replacement can be performed safely and provides similar survival to first-time aortic root replacement. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;166:716-24)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据