4.3 Article

Lifting scheme for streamflow data in river networks

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12542

关键词

lifting scheme; river network; smoothing; spatial adaptation; spatial modelling; streamflow data

资金

  1. Canada First Research Excellence Fund (Global Water Futures: Solutions to Water Threats in an Era of Global Change, Climate-Related Precipitation Extremes project)
  2. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium
  3. Canadian Statistical Sciences Institute
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [2018R1D1A1B07042933, 2020R1A4A1018207]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07042933, 2020R1A4A1018207] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new multiscale method for analysing water pollutant data in river networks. By adapting the conventional lifting scheme, the method successfully performs multiscale analysis of streamflow data.
This paper presents a new multiscale method for analysing water pollutant data located in river networks. The main idea of the proposed method is to adapt the conventional lifting scheme, reflecting the characteristics of streamflow data in the river network domain. Due to the complexity of the data domain structure, it is difficult to apply the lifting scheme to the streamflow data directly. To solve this problem, we propose a new lifting scheme algorithm for streamflow data that incorporates flow-adaptive neighbourhood selection, flow proportional weight generation and flow-length adaptive removal point selection. A nondecimated version of the proposed lifting scheme is also provided. The simulation study demonstrates that the proposed method successfully performs a multiscale analysis of streamflow data. Furthermore, we provide a real data analysis of water pollutant data observed on the Geum-River basin compared to the existing smoothing method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据