4.5 Review

Parkinsonism and dystonia: Clinical spectrum and diagnostic clues

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120016

关键词

Dystonia; Parkinsonism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the clinical spectrum of dystonia-parkinsonism disorders and emphasizes the importance of diagnostic factors such as age at onset, associated symptoms, and neuroimaging. Diagnostic approaches may include dopamine transporter imaging, CSF analysis, and genetic testing. Recent advances in molecular genetics have helped unravel the underlying causes, especially in younger patients.
The links between the two archetypical basal ganglia disorders, dystonia and parkinsonism, are manifold and stem from clinical observations, imaging studies, animal models and genetics. The combination of both, i.e. the syndrome of dystonia-parkinsonism, is not uncommonly seen in movement disorders clinics and has a myriad of different underlying aetiologies, upon which treatment and prognosis depend. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we delineate the clinical spectrum of disorders presenting with dystonia-parkinsonism. The clinical approach depends primarily on the age at onset, associated neurological or systemic symptoms and neuroimaging. The tempo of disease progression, and the response to L-dopa are further important clues to tailor diagnostic approaches that may encompass dopamine transporter imaging, CSF analysis and, last but not least, genetic testing. Later in life, sporadic neurodegenerative conditions are the most frequent cause, but the younger the patient, the more likely the cause is unravelled by the recent advances of molecular genetics that are focus of this review. Here, knowledge of the associated phenotypic spectrum is key to guide genetic testing and interpretation of test results.This article is part of the Special Issue Parkinsonism across the spectrum of movement disorders and beyond edited by Joseph Jankovic, Daniel D. Truong and Matteo Bologna.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据