4.6 Article

Facile Material Design Concept for Co-Free Lithium Excess Nickel-Manganese Oxide as High-Capacity Positive Electrode Material

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac3526

关键词

Batteries; Lithium; Positive electrode material; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that Li1+x(Ni0.3Mn0.7)(1-x)O-2 samples calcined in an N-2 atmosphere had a more homogeneous transition metal distribution and reduced electrochemically inactive domains after electrochemical activation. Additionally, samples calcined in an N-2 atmosphere did not form spinel during charging and did not undergo oxide ion insertion reactions during discharging.
High-capacity Li1+x(Ni0.3Mn0.7)(1-x)O-2, (0 < x < 1/3) samples were synthesized by the coprecipitation-calcination method. Both electrochemical cycle and high-rate performances were drastically improved by selecting an N-2 atmosphere as final calcination. Scanning transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis showed that the sample calcined in an N-2 atmosphere had a more homogeneous transition metal distribution into primary particles than that calcined in air. The solid-state Li-7 nuclear magnetic resonance data showed that electrochemically inactive domains were only diminished for the sample calcined in an N-2 atmosphere after electrochemical activation. X-ray Rietveld analysis revealed that the suitable transition metal distribution and content of the samples were different from those of typical layered rock-salt materials. Only that calcined in an N-2 atmosphere had no spinel formation during charging and no oxide ion insertion reaction during discharging. No positive Co substitution effect was observed under the optimized preparation conditions. At the 100th cycle, the discharge capacity was 216 mAh g(-1), which corresponds to 87% of the initial capacity (251 mAh g(-1)) at optimizing synthetic condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据