4.6 Article

Stable SEI Formation on Al-Si-Mn Metallic Glass Li-Ion Anode

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac2d3f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study prepared an amorphous Al64Si25Mn11 Li-ion anode using splat quenching, with a specific capacity of >900 mAh g(-1). The metallic glass electrode showed reduced parasitic electrolyte reduction compared to pure Si or Al, and a SEI that was thinner, more stable, and richer in fluorinated inorganic phases. This indicates that metallic glasses could be a viable new class of Li-ion anode materials with improved surface passivity.
Alloying anodes such as silicon are of great interest for lithium-ion batteries due to their high lithium-ion storage capacities, but have only seen minimal commercial deployment due to their limited calendar life. This has been attributed to an intrinsically unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) that is aggravated by mechanical failure. An amorphous structure can mitigate lithiation strains, and amorphous alloys, or metallic glasses, often exhibit exceptional fracture toughness. Additional elements can be added to metallic glasses to improve passivation. Splat quenching was utilized to prepare an amorphous Al64Si25Mn11 Li-ion anode with a specific capacity >900 mAh g(-1) that remains amorphous upon cycling. On this metallic glass electrode, parasitic electrolyte reduction is found to be much reduced in comparison to pure Si or Al, and comparable to that on Cu. The SEI is much thinner, more stable, and richer in fluorinated inorganic phases than the SEI formed on Si, while organic carbonate compounds such as lithium ethylene decarbonate (LiEDC) are notably absent. This study indicates that metallic glasses can become a viable new class of Li-ion anode materials with improved surface passivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据