4.6 Article

Recyclable Composites of Mo/Fe Co-Doped ZnO1-x/Cu2O for Enhanced Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac35fd

关键词

P-n junction; Bimetallic active sites; Oxygen vacancy; Liquid membrane reaction; Photocatalyst nitrogen fixation

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020MB143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully achieved photocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction by growing a layer of Cu2O crystal film and doping ZnO nanoparticles with bimetallic Mo and Fe on the surface of a copper mesh. It was found that the increase in ammonia yield is mainly attributed to the synergistic effect of bimetallic doping, moderate oxygen vacancies, and p-n heterojunction.
A layer of Cu2O crystal film and ZnO nanoparticles doped with bimetallic Mo and Fe were successively grown on the surface of a copper mesh, which was applied in a liquid membrane photoreaction apparatus for photocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction (PNRR). The characterization results indicate that the excellent ammonia yield benefits mainly from the synergistic effect of bimetallic doping, moderate oxygen vacancies (OVs), and p-n heterojunction. Surface defects caused by in situ doping of Mo and Fe ions act as active centers to capture and migrate electrons from the catalyst to adsorbed N-2 molecule. With the introduction of bimetallic ions, the formation of more mesoporous enlarges the specific surface area, causing abundant reaction sites on the surface of the catalyst, which enhances the adsorption and activation of dinitrogen molecules. The existence of oxygen vacancy reduces the band gap and enhances the absorption of visible light. Furthermore, the p-n heterostructure promotes the effective transfer and separation of photogenerated carriers. Compared with the original Cu2O or ZnO, the photocatalytic ammonia yield of Mo-Fe co-doped ZnO/Cu2O is increased by 6.6 and 7.3 times, respectively, reaching 119.42 mu mol cm(-2) h(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据