4.6 Article

High Performance SrFe0.2Co0.4Mo0.4O3-δ Ceramic Anode Supported Low-Temperature SOFCs

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac3592

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE ARPA-E [DE-AR0000494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a new ceramic anode material has allowed for high performance and stability of low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (LT-SOFCs), achieving peak power density at ambitious low temperatures and demonstrating long-term stability in hydrocarbon gases. This research shows promising potential for practical applications in the future.
The development of alternative ceramic anodes for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (LT-SOFCs) is essential to overcome the inherent challenges such as redox instability and coking associated with Ni-based cermet anodes. Moreover, due to the large electrolyte ohmic loss at low temperature, it is critical to developing an electrode supported cell that allows electrolyte thickness reduction. Here we successfully demonstrated a high performance SrFe0.2Co0.4Mo0.4O3-delta (SFCM) ceramic anode supported LT-SOFC with a peak power density of 730 mW cm(-2) and 300 mW cm(-2) at ambitious low temperatures of 550 degrees C and 450 degrees C, respectively, in humidified H-2. The new anode material SFCM exhibits exceptional conductivity of over 30 S cm(-1) at 450 degrees C in humidified H-2, providing essential current collection capability as an anode backbone appropriate for the infiltration of Ni-gadolinia doped ceria (GDC) electrocatalysts. Compared to conventional Ni-cermet anodes, the nano-sized Ni-GDC particles in our SFCM based electrode significantly improves the cell stability in hydrocarbon gases. We demonstrated a stable long-term operation over a period of 380 h in CH4-containing gas mixtures at 450 degrees C with a voltage degradation rate of 4% per 1000 h at a constant current of 0.2 A*cm(-2). Our results demonstrate a high performance ceramic anode with high stability for low temperature operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据