4.4 Article

Temperature profile and gas emissions of jet fuel using a low power flameless combustor

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-03305-w

关键词

Flameless; Jet fuel; Combustion; Flow blurry; Thermodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flameless combustion shows significant potential for aeronautical applications due to its homogeneous temperature distribution, relatively low temperatures, high thermal efficiency, reduced NOx emissions, and reduced thermal stress in the chamber. This study demonstrates the possibility of achieving flameless combustion of Jet A-1 fuel through experimental data obtained in a small combustion chamber.
Flameless combustion has significant potential for aeronautical applications since it is a regime with homogeneous temperature distribution, relatively low temperatures, high thermal efficiency, reduced NOx emissions, and reduced thermal stress in the chamber. This work demonstrates the possibility of achieving flameless combustion of Jet A-1 fuel and presents experimental data obtained in a small combustion chamber that uses the energy generated to heat up the combustion air with a thermal input of 4.36 kW. A blurry injector was adopted for efficient fuel atomization (Sauter mean diameter of 28.6 +/- 0.28 mu m) adjacent to the nozzle orifice exit. The evolution of the main process parameters has indicated transition from conventional combustion to flameless regime after 60 min from ignition, with excess combustion air of 70%, fuel mass flow rate of 0.1018 g/s and combustion air temperature 589 K. Combustion air momentum rate and velocity were 0.1678 N and 345 m/s, respectively, whereas the droplet vaporization time was estimated as 0.27 ms and residence time of 3.37 ms. Temperatures measured at different locations inside the chamber were within 987 +/- 29.5 K after 75 min from ignition, and average NOx, UHC emissions were, respectively, 21.5 ppm and 1 ppm between 70 and 100 min from ignition and an increase of 20 ppm for CO emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据