4.8 Article

Frustration Dynamics and Electron-Transfer Reorganization Energies in Wild-Type and Mutant Azurins

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 9, 页码 4178-4185

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c13454

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Theoretical Biological Physics
  2. NSF [PHY-2019745]
  3. National Science Foundation [OCI-0959097]
  4. Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01DK019038]
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  8. D.R. Bullard-Welch Chair at Rice University [C-0016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates long-range electron tunneling through metalloproteins. The findings reveal that the rapid electron flow in wild-type azurin is facilitated by a pattern of minimally frustrated local and distant interactions, while sluggish electron transfer reactions in active-site azurin variants are attributed to increased frustration near and distant from the copper site.
Long-range electron tunneling through metalloproteins is facilitated by evolutionary tuning of donor-acceptor electronic couplings, formal electrochemical potentials, and active-site reorganization energies. Although the minimal frustration of the folding landscape enables this tuning, residual frustration in the vicinity of the metallocofactor can allow conformational fluctuations required for protein function. We show here that the constrained copper site in wild-type azurin is governed by an intricate pattern of minimally frustrated local and distant interactions that together enable rapid electron flow to and from the protein. In contrast, sluggish electron transfer reactions (unfavorable reorganization energies) of active-site azurin variants are attributable to increased frustration near to as well as distant from the copper site, along with an exaggerated oxidation-state dependence of both minimally and highly frustrated interaction patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据