4.8 Article

Selective Difunctionalization of Unactivated Aliphatic Alkenes Enabled by a Metal-Metallaaromatic Catalytic System

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 5, 页码 2301-2310

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c12586

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [22071206, 92156021, 21931002, 21671164]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20200109140812302]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis [2020B121201002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design of organometallic catalysts plays a crucial role in the development of catalytic reactions. In this study, a heterometallic [Os-Cu] complex with characteristics of bimetallics, metal-laaromatics, and pincer complexes is described as a highly effective catalyst for selective amino- and oxyselenation of unactivated alkenes.
The design of organometallic catalysts is crucial in the development of catalytic reactions. Herein, we describe a heterometallic [Os-Cu] complex with the characteristics of bimetallics, metal-laaromatics, and pincer complexes. This complex serves as a highly effective catalyst for selective amino- and oxyselenation of unactivated alkenes. More than 80 examples including challenging substrates of unsymmetric aliphatic alkenes and amine-based nucleophiles in such reactions are provided. These reactions produce 1,2-difunctionalized products with good yields and high levels of chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity. Our studies revealed the following: (i) The usually inert osmium center activates the N- or O-centered nucleophiles. (ii) The copper-osmium bonding and its cooperative effects play essential roles in control the selectivity by bringing the reaction components into close proximity. (iii) The metallaaromatic moiety helps to stabilize the intermediate. These findings provide a versatile platform for catalyst design based on metal-metallaaromatic cooperative effects that have not been attained previously with bimetallic complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据