4.8 Article

BesC Initiates C-C Cleavage through a Substrate-Triggered and Reactive Diferric-Peroxo Intermediate

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 50, 页码 21416-21424

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c11109

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM135315, GM125924, GM127588]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BesC is a member of an emerging family of diiron enzymes that catalyze an unusual type of carbon-carbon cleavage reaction. It activates O-2 in a substrate-gated manner to generate a diferric-peroxo intermediate, initiating a unique reaction trajectory by cleaving the C4-H bond as the rate-limiting step in a single turnover reaction.
BesC catalyzes the iron- and O-2-dependent cleavage of 4-chloro-L-lysine to form 4-chloro-L-allylglycine, formaldehyde, and ammonia. This process is a critical step for a biosynthetic pathway that generates a terminal alkyne amino acid which can be leveraged as a useful bio-orthogonal handle for protein labeling. As a member of an emerging family of diiron enzymes that are typified by their heme oxygenase-like fold and a very similar set of coordinating ligands, recently termed HDOs, BesC performs an unusual type of carbon-carbon cleavage reaction that is a significant departure from reactions catalyzed by canonical dinuclear-iron enzymes. Here, we show that BesC activates O-2 in a substrate-gated manner to generate a diferric-peroxo intermediate. Examination of the reactivity of the peroxo intermediate with a series of lysine derivatives demonstrates that BesC initiates this unique reaction trajectory via cleavage of the C4-H bond; this process represents the rate-limiting step in a single turnover reaction. The observed reactivity of BesC represents the first example of a dinuclear-iron enzyme that utilizes a diferric-peroxo intermediate to capably cleave a C-H bond as part of its native function, thus circumventing the formation of a high-valent intermediate more commonly associated with substrate monooxygenations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据