4.6 Article

A phase 3 open-label, randomized multicenter study to evaluate efficacy and safety of secukinumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week results

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.066

关键词

moderate to severe plaque psoriasis; pediatric psoriasis; secukinumab

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of two secukinumab dosage regimens in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, showing both doses were superior to historical placebo and well tolerated by the patients.
Background: Psoriasis affects 0.13%-2.1% of children and adolescents. Despite a high unmet need, the current treatment options approved for pediatric psoriasis are limited. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 secukinumab dosage regimens (low dose: 75/75/150 mg; high dose: 75/150/300 mg) stratified and randomized by weight (<25 kg, 25 to <50 kg, >= 50 kg) and disease severity (moderate, severe) in pediatric patients aged 6-<18 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: This is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, multicenter study (NCT03668613). Results: Both secukinumab doses were superior to historical placebo with respect to psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)-75/90 and investigator global assessment 0/1 responses at week 12. The estimated probability of a positive treatment effect (ie, log odds ratio > 0) for low- or high-dose secukinumab compared to historical placebo is 1 (ie, 100%). For the low and high doses at week 12, the investigator global assessment 0/1 response rates were 78.6% and 83.3%, respectively, and the PASI-90 response rates were 69% and 76.2%, respectively. The PASI-75 response rate was 92.9% for both the doses. Limitations: This is an open-label study design without a control arm. Conclusion: Secukinumab dosing regimens were efficacious and well tolerated in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据