4.4 Article

Enhancing a community palliative care service with telehealth leads to efficiency gains and improves job satisfaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 625-630

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X211048952

关键词

Telehealth; palliative care; job satisfaction; cost; efficiency; telemedicine

资金

  1. Clinical Excellence Division, Queensland Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the introduction of telehealth in community palliative care services led to increased service efficiency and staff job satisfaction while maintaining equivalent costs.
Telepalliative care services enable clinicians to provide essential palliation services to people with a life-limiting illness in or closer to home. This study aims to explore the costs, service activity and staff experiences resulting from the introduction of telehealth in a community palliative care service in Queensland, Australia. Pre- and post-activity and cost data from the 2016-2017 and 2019-2020 financial years were examined and staff members interviewed. Accounting for inflation and standard wage increases, the labour costs before and after the addition of telehealth were approximately equal. There were small variations in non-labour costs, but these were not directly attributable to the expansion of the telehealth services. Overall, the service activity increased by 189% for standard doctor and nurse consultations, due to the increased efficiency of telehealth compared to the previous outreach (travel) model. Thematic analysis of the staff interview data generated an overarching theme of Increased Job Satisfaction which staff attributed to the patient-centred nature of the telepalliative care service, the increased peer support and increased professional development. Compared with the traditional in-person service, the new telehealth-supported model resulted in equivalent costs, greater efficiency by allowing palliative care to reach more patients and improved staff job satisfaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据