Evaluation of an Expedited Trauma Transfer Protocol: Right Place, Right Time

Background: Trauma patients may initially be evaluated at non-trauma centers. This may cause a delay in treatment, which could affect their outcome. Additionally, advanced imaging may be performed which may be suboptimal or unnecessary, increase time to transfer, or unable to be viewed when the patient reaches a trauma center increasing the delays to treatment or need for repeat imaging. Rapid identification and transfer to definitive trauma care, minimizing unnecessary delays should be the priority. Methods: The trauma registry at a regional Level 1 Adult/Pediatric Trauma center was queried for transferred trauma patients over a 3-y period. A retrospective review was performed. Transferred trauma patients were compared prior to an expedited transfer protocol to after implementation. Demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, computerized tomography scans performed prior to transfer, mortality, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were compared using bivariate and multivariable regression statistics where appropriate. Results: Transferred trauma patients were identified, 683 in the pre-protocol group and 821 in the post-protocol group, an increase of 16.8%. There were no differences in age, sex, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, mortality, hospital, or intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) throughout the study period. There was a significant decrease in time to transfer (263 min +/- 222 versus 227 +/- 189, P < 0.001) and computerized tomography scans performed prior to transfer (Head 47% versus 32%, C-spine 36% versus 23%, Thorax 22% versus 16%, Abdomen/Pelvis 24% versus 14%, all P values < 0.001 except CT Thorax). Interestingly, the rate of underinsured patients did not increase (21% versus 25%, P = 0.05). Risk-adjusted mortality and hospital LOS also did not change during the study period. Conclusions: After implementation of an expedited trauma transfer protocol to a regional Level 1 trauma center there was an associated reduced time of arrival to definitive care and decreased advanced imaging done prior to transfer. However, there was no associated decrease in mortality or LOS among transferred patients. Further studies examining pre -hospital transport or hospital choice decisions and subsequent care provided at non-trauma facilities regarding imaging obtained, care rendered, and transfer decisions can be explored. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

This study found that implementing an expedited trauma transfer protocol led to reduced time of arrival to definitive care and decreased advanced imaging done prior to transfer for transferred trauma patients. However, there was no associated decrease in mortality or length of stay among these patients. Further research is needed to examine pre-hospital transport and hospital choice decisions to improve care provided to trauma patients.