4.5 Article

High-pressure hydrothermal synthesis of MoVTeNbOx with high surface V5+ abundance for oxidative conversion of propane to acrylic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105469

关键词

MoVTeNbOx; High-pressure hydrothermal; Propane; Selective oxidation; Acrylic acid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706165]
  2. Scien-tific Research Fund of Liaoning Provincial Education Department, China [LQ2019007]
  3. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC2002001]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [2021-MS-255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-pressure hydrothermal method was used to synthesize a series of MoVTeNbOx-mixed metal oxides with high catalytic performance. The sample synthesized at 200 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes showed the highest selectivity for propane selective oxidation, attributed to its high surface V5+ abundance and largest proportion of terminating (001) plane. Additionally, the prepared MoVTeNbOx exhibited excellent stability in high temperature continuous reaction.
A series of MoVTeNbOx-mixed metal oxides were synthesized by high-pressure hydrothermal method. The effects of temperature and time during the preparation process on the structure and catalytic performance of MoVTeNbOx were investigated. It was demonstrated that high content of M1 phase (94.5%) MoVTeNbOx with typical needle-shape morphology and high surface abundance of V5+ (68.9%) could be fabricated by high-pressure hydrothermal method in a short time (30-60 min) without hydrogen peroxide post-treatment. The catalytic results of propane selective oxidation showed that the MoVTeNbOx sample synthesized at 200 degrees C for 30 min possessed the highest surface V5+ abundance and largest proportion of terminating (001) plane, displaying the highest selectivity (74.1%) for acrylic acid. Moreover, the prepared MoVTeNbOx showed excellent stability in high temperature continuous reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据