4.4 Article

Tightening Procedures for Proper Installation of Anchor Rods in Ancillary Structures

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 147, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003110

关键词

Anchor rod; Pretension; Nut rotation; Nut loosening; Torque; Ancillary structures; Tightening procedures; Turn-of-the-nut

资金

  1. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research reviewed the causes of several ancillary structure collapses in the past two decades, with a focus on the issue of loose anchor nuts. Approximately 30% of anchor nuts in the inspected structures were found to be loose, with the exact cause still unknown. Through testing 100 galvanized steel anchor rods of different diameters and grades, the study aimed to identify the relationship between applied torque, nut rotation, and rod pretension.
In the last 2 decades, many ancillary structures have collapsed, with several instances traceable to loose anchor nuts. According to a quality assurance inspection conducted by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) in 2012, approximately 30% of the anchor nuts on the inspected ancillary structures across the state of Virginia were found to be loose. The exact cause of the loose anchor nuts is not known; however, one theory is that specified tightening procedures were not properly followed or were not adequate. Currently, a turn-of-the-nut method is used for the tightening of anchor nuts on double-nut moment connections at the base of ancillary structures. This research reviewed current tightening procedures for anchor nuts on ancillary structures. The relationship between three critical tightening parameters-applied torque, nut rotation, and pretension in the rod-was examined. One hundred galvanized steel anchor rods of five different diameters and three different grades were tested. The experimental tests serve as a benchmark to validate the current tightening procedures, as well as to recommend changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据