4.6 Article

Inhomogeneous asymmetric exclusion processes between two reservoirs: large deviations for the local empirical observables in the mean-field approximation

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ac4044

关键词

diffusion in random media; exclusion processes; large deviations in non-equilibrium systems; stochastic particle dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces the trajectory probabilities for a given inhomogeneous exclusion processes to identify relevant local empirical observables and obtain corresponding rate functions. By considering mean-field approximations for different models, the study explores large deviations and properties of time-additive space-local observables.
For a given inhomogeneous exclusion processes on N sites between two reservoirs, the trajectories probabilities allow to identify the relevant local empirical observables and to obtain the corresponding rate function at level 2.5. In order to close the hierarchy of the empirical dynamics that appear in the stationarity constraints, we consider the simplest approximation, namely the mean-field approximation for the empirical density of two consecutive sites, in direct correspondence with the previously studied mean-field approximation for the steady state. For a given inhomogeneous totally asymmetric model, this mean-field approximation yields the large deviations for the joint distribution of the empirical density profile and of the empirical current around the mean-field steady state; the further explicit contraction over the current allows to obtain the large deviations of the empirical density profile alone. For a given inhomogeneous asymmetric model, the local empirical observables also involve the empirical activities of the links and of the reservoirs; the further explicit contraction over these activities yields the large deviations for the joint distribution of the empirical density profile and of the empirical current. The consequences for the large deviations properties of time-additive space-local observables are also discussed in both cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据