4.6 Article

Delayed admissions and efficacy of steroid use in patients with critical and severe COVID-19: an apprehensive approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 43-48

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab239

关键词

corona virus disease 2019; COVID-19; Pakistan; severity; treatments

资金

  1. Global Health Development (GHD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that in patients with severe/critical COVID-19, age over 60, presence of hypertension, heart disease, kidney disease, and late admission (over 5 days) were significant predictors of mortality. The study highlights the importance of timely provision of appropriate medical interventions in controlling COVID-19-related mortality.
Background Inadvertent delays in access to appropriate therapeutic interventions in high-risk group coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients contribute to mortality in patients with severe/critical disease presentation. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the effect of timely admission to the hospital on mortality of patients with severe/critical COVID-19. Another secondary aspect of this study was to observe the efficacy of time-dependent use of corticosteroids on mortality of critical/severe COVID-19 patients. Methods Clinical data of 659 patients with severe/critical COVID-19, admitted to four major tertiary care hospitals from the Islamabad-Rawalpindi region of Pakistan was retrospectively collected from a period February-August 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the predictors of mortality in severe/critical COVID-19 patients. Results Out of a total of 659 patients, 469 (71.2%) patients died. Age > 60 years, presence of hypertension, heart disease and kidney disease along with late admission (>5 days) were significant predictors of mortality in patients with severe/critical COVID-19. Conclusions The study highlights the importance of well-timed provision of appropriate medical interventions control COVID-19-associated mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据