4.6 Article

Gender inequality is associated with gender differences and women participation in physical activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 E519-E526

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab354

关键词

epidemiology; gender; physical activity; public health; social determinants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that higher gender inequality is associated with differences in physical activity between genders, while lower gender inequality is linked to increased physical activity levels in both women and men. Lower levels of physical activity in women could be influenced by gender inequality.
Background Living standards determine population's physical activity (PA); however, more women are systemically insufficiently active, suggesting social gender inequality factors. Thus, we assessed the association between gender inequality, PA differences between genders, and total PA. Methods We used three independent cross-sectional databases at country-level: PA prevalence (i.e., Active Lifestyle) from the World Health Organization with 1.9 million individuals from 168 countries; daily steps (smartphone registers) of 693 806 people from 46 countries and sport participation in the 2016 Summer Olympics with 11 191 athletes. Gender Inequality Index was used to evaluate aspects surrounding gender equality controlling for overall economic and health status. Results Higher gender inequality was associated with gender differences in PA (Active Lifestyle, 0.402, P < 0.001; Steps, 0.542, P < 0.001; Olympic participation, 0.346, P = 0.001). Likewise, lower gender inequality was associated with increased women activity (Active Lifestyle, -0.838, P < 0.001; Steps, -0.81, P < 0.001; Olympic participation, -0.577, P < 0.001), and men activity (Active Lifestyle, -0.453, P < 0.001; Steps, -0.461, P = 0.002). Conclusions Lower women PA levels could be influenced by gender inequality. Public health policies aimed to improve women living conditions which may promote their participation in PA and sport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据