4.3 Article

A virtual lymph node model to dissect the requirements for T-cell activation by synapses and kinapses

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 7, 页码 680-688

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/icb.2016.36

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut Pasteur
  2. Inserm
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  4. European Research Council starting grant (LymphocyteContacts)
  5. Auckland Bioengineering Institute
  6. Maurice Wilkins Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The initiation of T-cell responses in lymph nodes requires T cells to integrate signals delivered by dendritic cells (DCs) during long-lasting contacts (synapses) or more transient interactions (kinapses). However, it remains extremely challenging to understand how a specific sequence of contacts established by T cells ultimately dictates T-cell fate. Here, we have coupled a computational model of T-cell migration and interactions with DCs with a real-time, flow cytometry-like representation of T-cell activation. In this model, low-affinity peptides trigger T-cell proliferation through kinapses but we show that this process is only effective under conditions of high DC densities and prolonged antigen availability. By contrast, high-affinity peptides favor synapse formation and a vigorous proliferation under a wide range of antigen presentation conditions. In line with the predictions, decreasing the DC density in vivo selectively abolished proliferation induced by the low-affinity peptide. Finally, our results suggest that T cells possess a biochemical memory of previous stimulations of at least 1-2 days. We propose that the stability of T-cell-DC interactions, apart from their signaling potency, profoundly influences the robustness of T-cell activation. By offering the ability to control parameters that are difficult to manipulate experimentally, the virtual lymph node model provides new possibilities to tackle the fundamental mechanisms that regulate T-cell responses elicited by infections or vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据