4.3 Article

Nutrition integration across the nursing curriculum: A novel teaching model within a pre-licensure program

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1162-1166

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.10.006

关键词

Nutrition education; Nutrition competency; Interprofessional collaboration

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutrition education is crucial in supporting optimal patient care and health outcomes across the healthcare spectrum, and nurses need sufficient nutrition education to support health promotion and disease management. The lack of nutrition education in nursing curricula is a common issue, and interdisciplinary collaboration requires nurses to reinforce and support the dissemination of accurate nutrition education.
Across the healthcare spectrum, the provision of evidence-based nutrition education is critical in supporting optimal patient care and health outcomes. Nurses are uniquely positioned to deliver nutrition-focused patient education related to health promotion and disease management; yet widespread evidence of sufficient nutrition instruction in nursing curricula is not available. Although lifestyle and nutrition recommendations have historically been the domain of registered dietitians, interprofessional collaboration requires that nurses are prepared to reinforce and support the dissemination of accurate nutrition education. Interdisciplinary teaching approaches are therefore imperative for consistent communication and execution of nutrition guidance. At a private nursing college, an innovative model for nutrition integration across a nursing curriculum has been developed and implemented. This model features an ongoing instructional partnership between registered dietitian faculty and nurse educators. This integrative model enhances nutrition-related nursing competencies demonstrated by undergraduate nursing students and aims to produce graduates who are confident in the delivery of nutrition-related nursing care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据