4.5 Article

Developing accurate data-driven soft-sensors through integrating dynamic kernel slow feature analysis with neural networks

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 208-220

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.09.006

关键词

Kernel slow feature analysis; Soft-sensor; Neural network; Dynamic data-driven modelling; Machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a data-driven soft-sensor modelling approach based on dynamic kernel slow feature analysis (KSFA), which can extract nonlinear driving forces and improve soft-sensor performance by utilizing a neural network to reduce noise. The combination of KSFA with a neural network further enhances soft-sensor performance in cases of nonlinear relationships.
A data-driven soft-sensor modelling approach based on dynamic kernel slow feature analysis (KSFA) is proposed in this paper. Slow feature analysis is a feature extraction method that aims to extract slowly varying features that can capture the driving forces behind data. However, there are situations where linear SFA (LSFA) cannot capture the driving forces due to nonlinear relationships between the driving forces and input signals. KSFA is a nonlinear extension of LSFA that utilises the kernel trick to map the inputs into a higher-dimensional feature space. Extracting the nonlinear driving forces can improve soft-sensor performance by utilising the nonlinear slow features as inputs to a neural network, which provides information on the key underlying trends, with the added benefit of noise reduction. Combining KSFA with a neural network further improves soft-sensor performance for cases where nonlinear relationships between the driving forces and soft-sensor outputs are present. The effectiveness of the proposed method is first demonstrated on a numerical example, where the theoretical advantages of KSFA can be easily observed. It is then applied to a benchmark simulated industrial fed-batch penicillin process. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据