4.8 Review

Bio-inspired flow channel designs for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 522, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231003

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells; Bipolar plates; Bio-inspired flow channels; SWOT analysis

资金

  1. Basic Science Center Program for Ordered Energy Coversion of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51888103]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [20ZR1438700]
  3. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51721004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells play important roles, and flow channel design is a highly active research field. This paper classifies bio-inspired flow channels into four types based on different bionic prototypes and analyzes their pros and cons. Furthermore, SWOT analysis is conducted on bio-inspired flow channel designs, and the research directions and prospects are summarized.
The bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) perform several significant functions, and the flow channel design of these bipolar plates is one of the most active research fields. In addition to the conventional parallel, serpentine, and interdigitated flow channels, many researchers have applied bionics to flow channel designs to explore a series of bio-inspired flow channels. In this paper, based on different prototypes of bionics, the bio-inspired flow channels are classified into four types, i.e., leaf, lung, tree, and unconventional shape, and their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. In addition, the analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) is carried out on the bio-inspired flow channel designs, and the research directions and prospects of bio-inspired flow channel designs are summarized. This study can provide corre-sponding references and guidance for the flow channel designs of PEMFCs in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据