4.8 Article

Prussian blue analogue Co3(Co(CN)6)2 cuboids as an electrode material for high-performance supercapacitor

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 513, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230521

关键词

Prussian blue analogues; Cobalt hexa cyano cobaltate; Supercapacitors

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) - Korea government(MSIT) [2019R1A2C1089080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Prussian blue analogue Co-3(Co(CN)(6))(2) (CoHCC) cuboid was synthesized directly on Ni-foam via a simple solvothermal method, showing excellent electrochemical properties and promising future applications. The material exhibited the best performance at 150 degrees Celsius, achieving a maximum specific capacity of 1118C g(-1) and maintaining 89% capacity retention over 5000 cycles.
Prussian blue analogue Co-3(Co(CN)(6))(2) (CoHCC) cuboids were directly synthesized on Ni-foam from a single cobalt source precursor via a facile solvothermal method, and the effect of annealing temperature on the physical and electrochemical properties were studied. CoHCC:Ni-foam annealed at 150 degrees C was free from zeolitic water content and exhibited a maximum specific capacity of 1118C g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1) and an excellent cycling stability over 5000 cycles with 89% retention in capacity. It was found that the maximum specific capacity is a result of contributions from the capacitive contribution (originating from the electric double layer capacitance and pseudo capacitance) and diffusion capacitance (originating from insertion/desertion of K+ ions in the CoHCC framework). Moreover, an asymmetric supercapacitor constructed from CoHCC:Ni-foam and activated carbon delivered specific energies of 22.5 Wh kg(-1) and 17 Wh kg(-1) at the specific powers of 990 W kg(-1) and 2464 W kg(-1), respectively, and exhibited excellent cycling stability over 5000 cycles. The excellent electrochemical performance of CoHCC:Ni-foam electrodes suggests a promising future for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据