4.5 Article

Nutrient uptake of catch crops under non-limiting growth conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
卷 184, 期 6, 页码 709-722

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202100142

关键词

nitrogen; nutrient use efficiency; phosphorus; potassium; root architecture

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate N, P, and K uptake of different catch crop species, with phacelia showing the highest nutrient uptake and mixtures of catch crops performing equally well. Nutrient uptake was closely related to root parameters.
Background Catch crops enhance nutrient cycling of cropping systems. Considering possible limitations of catch crop studies in field and greenhouse experiments, a new approach was chosen to combine the advantages of both systems in quantifying the potential for nutrient retention by catch crops. Aims This study aimed at identifying N, P, and K uptake of different catch crop species grown in monoculture and as a mixture under non-limiting growth conditions in terms of water and nutrient availability. Methods Catch crops were cultivated under semi-controlled conditions in large containers (August to November 2020). Shoot N, P, and K uptake, leachate accumulation, and soil N-min, CAL-P, and CAL-K (0-30 cm) were quantified after harvest. After washing, root parameters were quantified with a root scanner. Results Nutrient uptake of N, P, and K was highest for phacelia. The mixture of seven different catch crops performed equally well. Nutrient uptake was closely related to root length and root surface area. Conclusions Under non-limiting growth conditions, phacelia has the highest potential to conserve N, P, and K for a succeeding crop; however, the low C : N ratio of the frost-sensitive crop could promote nutrient losses during winter. We conclude that growing a single catch crop can be as effective in reducing the nutrient leaching potential as cultivating a mixture of catch crops when nutrients and water are no growth-limiting factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据