4.7 Article

Melatonin delays dark-induced leaf senescence by inducing miR171b expression in tomato

期刊

JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12792

关键词

alpha-glucan water dikinase (GWD); carbon starvation; chlorophyll; growth; miRNAs; resistance; starch degradation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD1000800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31922078, 31872089]
  3. Zhejiang University Shanghai Institute for Advanced Study [ZJU-SIAS-0011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melatonin promotes plant tolerance against carbon starvation by upregulating the expression of miR171b, which can directly inhibit GWD expression in tomato leaves.
Melatonin functions in multiple aspects of plant growth, development, and stress response. Nonetheless, the mechanism of melatonin in plant carbon metabolism remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the influence of melatonin on the degradation of starch in tomato leaves. Results showed that exogenous melatonin attenuated carbon starvation-induced chlorophyll degradation and leaf senescence. In addition, melatonin delayed leaf starch degradation and inhibited the transcription of starch-degrading enzymes after sunset. Interestingly, melatonin-alleviated symptoms of leaf senescence and starch degradation were compromised when the first key gene for starch degradation, alpha-glucan water dikinase (GWD), was overexpressed. Furthermore, exogenous melatonin significantly upregulated the transcript levels of several microRNAs, including miR171b. Crucially, the GWD gene was identified as a target of miR171b, and the overexpression of miR171b ameliorated the carbon starvation-induced degradation of chlorophyll and starch, and inhibited the expression of the GWD gene. Taken together, these results demonstrate that melatonin promotes plant tolerance against carbon starvation by upregulating the expression of miR171b, which can directly inhibit GWD expression in tomato leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据